Totally agreed - I was just saying that the History section would
include links to existing resources - plus perhaps a brief sentence
explaining what those things actually meant (so that newcomers can
decide if they're interested in them!).
Agreed on duplication just within the /dev and other official areas in
some cases too - but don't have the mental energy quite yet to tackle those.
- Shane
P.S. Huh. Maybe the standard a.o footer "Foundation" section should
have a "Newcomers" link or the like that points to community.a.o.
Otherwise, as someone asked, how do people even find this site?
P.P.S. Was it a conscious decision to use a different page template than
a.o, or just an oversight? Pondering if we should consider adding the
a.o footer or not, etc., or just keep it super simple.
On 2012-05-21 3:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 18 May 2012 02:02, Shane Curcuru<a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
...
- Beef up History section to include public records (all board reports, the
original resolution), plus links to the /foundation/governance and the
/history pages on the a.o site...
We have IMO way too much duplication of this basic info around our
sites, so in general it's probably better to just link to information
that's already available elsewhere.
-Bertrand
