On 27.09.2012 12:34, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 27 September 2012 11:01, "Ulrich Stärk" <u...@spielviel.de> wrote: >> On Thu, September 27, 2012 11:24, Ross Gardler wrote: >>> On 27 September 2012 10:17, "Ulrich Stärk" <u...@spielviel.de> wrote: >>>> So an additional binary package including e.g. your Hibernate >>>> integration >>>> and a separate location in SVN/GIT where users can get the sources are >>>> OK >>>> IMO as long as both are not part of your official source distribution. >>> >>> This is not correct. The ASF does not maintain code under incompatible >>> licenses. >>> >>> Ross >>> >> >> Were did I say that? I'm talking about code depending on software with >> incompatible licenses, such as a Hibernate integration. > > If you didn't mean a separate SVN/Git repo on ASF hardware then you > didn't say it and I misunderstood.
I said "separate location in SVN/GIT" and meant a separate folder or whatever but not a separate repo. > > The code in question, at > http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/ is under the > GPL. The questions, as I read them, can be paraphrased as "can we > develop GPL code using ASF infrastructure for everything else", from a > community perspective I would say the answer is no (which you seem to > agree with). I don't believe the question is about being legal able to > use the code, the PMC is already using it. > > Ross > So everyone agrees. Great ;) Uli
