On 14 January 2014 17:19, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > That should be party-subscribe not subscribe-party. > thx, I finally got a confirmation, replied to the confirmation and are now waiting for the "welcome" mail. I assume that waits in some moderator queue.
rgds jan I. > > --Rich > > > On 01/14/2014 10:40 AM, jan i wrote: > >> Meant of course "party" not "play" sorry for the confusion. >> >> rgds >> jan I. >> >> >> On 14 January 2014 16:38, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote: >>>> >>>> On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand <mar...@beamartyr.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) >>>>> >>>>>> Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too >>>>>> did >>>>>> >>>>> not >>>>> know about it. The word implies a lot, but I am not sure my idea is >>>>> correct >>>>> >>>>> It's the list where I post: >>>> >>>> Hey, I'm going to be at FOSDEM. If you're going to be there, ping me, >>>> and >>>> let's have a beer. >>>> >>>> seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept >>> subscribe-play@play-subscribe and its not listed in >>> https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe >>> >>> but apart from that a good thing. >>> >>> Btw. I will be at FOSDEM giving a 2 short presentations and are positive >>> towards meeting other apache fellows over a glass of wine. >>> >>> rgds >>> jan I. >>> >>> -- >>>> Rich Bowen >>>> rbo...@rcbowen.com >>>> http://rcbowen.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> > -- > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen.com > http://rcbowen.com/ > >
