All, Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab.
We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like some feedback on what talk we should drop. There's a lot of overlap in many of the sessions proposed, and I expect that there are a number that could be considered redundant. We'll also need a fallback talk for this track, so if a particular speaker has several sessions, perhaps we can move one to fallback designation.
Shane, Ross, and Nick each have multiple talks marked accepted, but, in each case, there are a number of "Strongly Accept" votes, and I need to hear from a larger group on where we should go with this.
Perhaps we could put the three of them in a cage and let them fight it out. Or, worse, on a panel session.
--Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
