On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> > On 02/12/2014 11:57 AM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm a bit confused as to what the current status is on the track >> selection for ApacheCon NA. I've seen the proposed track list, but >> what do we do with the content of those tracks? And what about the >> proposals that still are not categorized, is that already definitive >> or still in a volatile state? >> > > Right now there are several sources of data: > > 1) The CFP system itself is where folks are rating talks. > > 2) http://tm3.org/cfpreview/ is list of all talks broken into topics > which will hopefully become the tracks. Next to each one is Yes/No/Maybe > based on the rating given in the CFP system, #1, above. I have now gone > through everything in the CFP system and noted their accept status in this > spreadsheet. Note that a lot are still "Maybe" indicating that they either > have no ratings at all, or came out as "average" on the accept scale. > > 3) http://tm3.org/actracks/ is days and proposed tracks each day. Now > that I'm done with #2, I'm moving on to #3, taking the completed tracks and > populating the actual schedule in #3. From here, we'll have to either add > or remove talks to make the final schedule. > > So, everything is still volatile, and I still need a lot of help. > > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > > Tell us what we can do to help. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
