Maybe Andrew Bayer instead of me. He is a core committer on Jenkins
(which has a strong affinity for CD); and jclouds moves faster.
CloudStack isn't really a CD type of project - at least not yet.

--David

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2014 08:47 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It might be more interesting to skip Cordova altogether. The industry
>>> is full of ferment about CD. If everyone checks their rhetoric at the
>>> door, there could be an interesting conversation about how to mesh the
>>> ideas of CD and the ideals of the ASF.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. I (from my comfortable arm chair, looking on) don't see
>> Cordova as being a snowflake; but the larger topic is interesting.  I
>> do see the software industry and a lot of open source projects waving
>> the CD flag. I personally don't see CD and the Apache Way as mutually
>> exclusive, though I see problems it could create if not handled well.
>>
>
> No, I don't think they're a snowflake, but it might be seen as a jerky move
> to exclude then from the conversation, as they're the ones that brought it
> up.
>
> I'd suggest we ask Andrew Grieve -
> http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/event/c75e06c0f1d804b37066b67fda9f4e62
> - to be on the panel, as he'll be giving a talk on their development
> lifecycle, so will have some ideas prepared.
>
> From the Infra side, of course I'd like to ask Joe to be on the panel, and
> possibly Sam as VP Infra and board member.
>
> And from a ... shall we say ... slower moving project, how about JimJag to
> represent both the httpd project and the board perspective.
>
> So then who else should we invite from a project that would benefit from a
> more rapid release cadence? Is that you, Dave, to represent CloudStack?
>
> At that point we'd be really pushing the size that a panel can tolerate
> being and not be a shouting match.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>

Reply via email to