I'm not denying it - but I don't personally see the need for it.

  Issac

On 08/07/2014 19:45, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Well, you can't deny that I did propose an amendment to the by-laws a
> posting ago. :-)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pierre Smits
> 
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Issac Goldstand <mar...@beamartyr.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> No, because contributors aren't proposing anything as far as the ASF is
>> concerned.  They're just having a discussion.
>>
>> Until it comes from a member, it's not a nomination or a proposal or
>> anything other than a discussion.
>>
>>   Issac
>>
>> On 08/07/2014 15:44, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Taking into consideration that nominate and propose - in general and in
>>> this context - mean the same and that any contributor can propose
>>> potentials for ASF Membership, shouldn't the by-laws of the Foundation
>>> reflect this?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Pierre Smits
>>>
>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional
>>> Services and Retail & Trade
>>> http://www.orrtiz.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, of course a community member can propose a member. As Rob says, the
>>>> nomination and election has to be done by the Members, but not all
>> projects
>>>> have existing members acting as the eyes and ears.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, not having members in a project community shouldn't impact
>> the
>>>> project since it is self-managing and membership is only a foundational
>>>> level thing. Nevertheless, the membership needs to be a good
>> cross-section
>>>> of our project communities.
>>>>
>>>> If a community member feels someone is being overlooked a mail to
>>>> priv...@community.apache.org will reach people who can add notes to the
>>>> member watch list.
>>>>
>>>> This is the right list for discussing what we look for in members.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my phone - please forgive brevity and typos
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Rob Vesse" <rve...@dotnetrdf.org>
>>>> Sent: ‎7/‎8/‎2014 10:42
>>>> To: "dev@community.apache.org" <dev@community.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: Proposing for Apache Member?
>>>>
>>>> Pierre
>>>>
>>>> Not unless one/more of those contributors is themselves a Member/Officer
>>>> of the ASF - see Sectopn 4.1 of the Bylaws
>>>> (http://apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html#4.1) which states the
>> following:
>>>>
>>>> To be eligible for membership, a person or entity must be nominated by a
>>>> current member of the corporation and must complete a written membership
>>>> application in such form as shall be adopted by the Board of Directors
>>>> from time to time
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Therefore contributors of a project can't directly, I guess they could
>>>> talk to ASF members they know and suggest that person with the aim of
>>>> getting a nomination but not being a member myself I'm not sure if that
>>>> would be acceptable behaviour.  Ultimately ASF is a meritocracy and my
>>>> personal impression based on people who I know of who've become members
>> in
>>>> the past couple of years is that to become a member you need to be
>> active
>>>> across the foundation (not just within a small part of it) for a
>> prolonged
>>>> period.
>>>>
>>>> One thing worth asking is why the community you are involved in feels
>> the
>>>> need to have someone be elected as a Member?
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>> On 08/07/2014 09:43, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible that contributors of a project can propose a community
>>>>> member to be elected as an Apache Member?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Pierre Smits
>>>>>
>>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
>>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
>>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional
>>>>> Services and Retail & Trade
>>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 

Reply via email to