+1 yes that sounds awesome. We could also get the people from CHLA who use OODT to participate too!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Pei Chen <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Content tracks at ApacheCon Austin >Is there any interest in having a category for Healthcare? Would be >interesting to see how others use ASF projects to solve different >healthcare issues. >Jay (from BigTop/RedHat) and I (cTAKES) were possibly thinking of doing a >cross project/joint thing on analysis clinical text to demo at Austin... > >On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/22/2014 12:28 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >>> What¹s my point of all this rambling? Well, what I¹m trying to say is >>> that having entirely project specific tracks might work well for some >>>large >>> projects, but probably not all. Certainly not for the ATS project. >>> >> >> Totally agreed. Content-category tracks always work better than >> project-specific tracks, where possible, and also have the wonderful >> side-effect of exposing people to projects/technologies that they're not >> already familiar with. >> >> --Rich >> >> >> -- >> Rich Bowen - [email protected] - @rbowen >> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >>
