+1 Concerning CD10, I think the language of the statement is correct, but the footnote is not helpful, even though also correct.
I think the problem might be context. For the footnote, try, "It is ASF policy that all software created and maintained by an Apache Project is available from the project to the public at no charge (section 6.3 of http://apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html). Third-party actions are governed by the license." The third-party observation is technically unnecessary, except it deals with the obvious questions that arise about downstream behavior. - Dennis PS: I confess that I had not observed how much has been done at a.o/dev. Stuff's happening! I will start referring folks to it. This is a great resource for podlings and first-time initial committers (and those of us who have not been paying attention). -----Original Message----- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 06:45 To: Bertrand Delacretaz Cc: dev Subject: Re: A maturity model for Apache projects Hi, Thanks to everybody who contributed, I think https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApacheProjectMaturityModel is ready for prime time, as a first version that might still evolve. (except maybe Justin's comments about CD10, let's see how you like the current wording) I suggest moving it under https://www.apache.org/dev/ alongside https://www.apache.org/dev/project-requirements which is more about processes, and link both documents to each other. WDYT? -Bertrand
