On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way >> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this >> intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in >> there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing >> that verbiage, I thought there was was copy&paste error in the report. > > As I read through the previous emails in the thread, I'm pretty sure > it was intentional. > My opinion is that it would be far more readable to state it like this: > > ============== > ## PMC/Committership changes (from LDAP):
Perhaps, but PMC membership is not governed by LDAP committee group changes It is not unknown for the LDAP group to be updated a long while before (or after) the PMC membership changes (indicated by updating the committee-info.txt file). A person may be on the PMC but not in LDAP and vice versa. Therefore it is wrong for the site to equate the two. [I am hopeful that the site will be able to use the correct source data eventually, but that is waiting on getting suitable access rights] There is a separate issue which is that not all PMCs equate committers with LDAP. For example, Subversion and Commons allow any ASF committer to update their SVN tree, so they don't maintain the group. Furthermore, I'm not sure the LDAP unix groups are used for Git-based projects. > - Currently 76 committers and 39 PMC members in the project. > - Hazem Saleh was added to the PMC on Fri May 15 2015 > - New commmitters: > - Bill Lucy was added as a committer on Tue Jun 23 2015 > - Ross Clewley was added as a committer on Mon May 18 2015 > - Thomas Andraschko was added as a committer on Thu Jul 02 2015 > - Dennis Kieselhorst was added as a committer on Mon May 11 2015 > ==============
