We are running builds on ASF infra for our source and java artifacts, but as I said it takes a lot of resource to cover 6+ flavors of linux and test the binary packaging on the live clusters. Besides, we have to have the privileged access to the build machines to run package installation tests, etc.
Cos On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 10:21PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Cos, > > Why are these builds not running on ASF infrastructure? > > John > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:49 PM Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I am not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I don't know of any > > better one. So here it is. > > > > At Bigtop project we have a number of hosts sitting on AWS and running some > > intensive CI for the project: building packages, spinning up the clusters, > > and testing them. For the consistency of the deployment recipes we'd like > > to > > have a CNAME for the CI master to be in the form of bigtop-ci.apache.org > > or, > > better yet, ci.bigtop.apache.org > > > > Is is a normal practice for the INFRA to setup such thing? Would be there > > any > > concerns about such a schema from the community stand-point? > > > > Thanks in advance > > Cos > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
