2015/8/11 上午1:35於 "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com>寫道：
>
> I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
> have handled this issue over time.
>
> The absolute requirement is open decision-making. Avoiding real-time
> communications avoids many possible failures of open decision-making.
> (Not, of course, all.) After all, the simplest primrose path here is
> two people standing at the intersection of their cubicles. The policy
> has always been to sternly warn that the use of real time mechanisms
> involves risks of failure, and that failure involves risks of the
> board's blunt instruments being deployed. Does all of this slow down
> some processes, and cause some people of limited patience / boundless
> energy to get frustrated? Yup, things have costs.
>
> Just writing up the results on the mailing list isn't good enough if
> there is no real opportunity for people to question, deliberate, and
> change the course of action.
>
> You want to have a bar camp, a con call, a slack discussion, a set of
> messages exchanged by carrier pigeon? Then it's up to you to make sure
> that you don't end up excluding people from the decision-making
> process.
