> On 18 Feb 2016, at 07:52, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > >> Rich, I only got access to review ApacheCon (formerly Core) submissions; no >> the Big Data ones. > > Same here (I think). If we find big data talk submitted to core should we a) > ask them to be moved to big data OR b) reject them. Seem to recall we had > this issue last time as well.
I’ve reviewed a couple of submissions and saw quite a few that should be moved to BigData. So far, I’ve rejected them and added a “move to big data” as category. I hope that somebody “behind the scenes” is willing and able to move these proposals to the right conference track. It would be a shame if proposals are rejected because they’re submitted to the incorrect conference… BTW: am I the only one that is missing out on a comment field to add additional comments why I want to accept or reject a proposal? -- Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect +31 631 765 814 My world is something with Amdatu and Apache Luminis Technologies Churchillplein 1 7314 BZ Apeldoorn +31 88 586 46 00 https://www.luminis.eu KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93 BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
