+++>1+ (it went through the 1)
> On Dec 12, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 6, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Rich, >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> ...I think it's >>>> fine for us, as a PMC in the most important open source organization on >>>> the planet, to have a similar level of rigor... >>> >>> I'm +0 on better defining the goals of comdev - meaning I think it's a >>> good idea but I don't have time to contribute much to that myself at >>> the moment. >>> >>> However I think we should not make people feel bad if they cannot help >>> as much as we or they would like to, by setting unrealistic goals. >>> >>> Like any Apache project, comdev must enjoy whatever value its >>> contributors add, while making it clear that people are free to >>> contribute as much or as little as they are willing and able. >>> >>> I hope we agree on that and I think we do, I'm just slightly worried >>> that your initiative might be interpreted in the wrong way. >> >> I'd like to strongly echo Bertrand here. To me, ComDev is first, and foremost >> an ASF's braintrust if you will of things that have to do with >> community development, >> governance and all around non-coding. It is a place to come and ask >> for advice, etc. >> > > I would suggest that not only is it the "storehouse" of tribal- > knowledge gained by the experience and expertise of us all, but > also the place where such tribal-knowledge is shared *and > documented*. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>
