On 24/10/17 12:41, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/10/17 05:56, Matt Sicker wrote: >> Go for it! Though perhaps some quick feedback from Tomcat would be good >> since they're the primary Apache project that uses the library. > > I assume we are talking about Pool 2.x. > > Pool 2.x is used by Tomcat 8 onwards and Tomcat 8 has a requirement of > Java 7 or later so updating Pool 2.x to Java 7 would not present a > problem for the Tomcat community.
Bah. Sorry, wrong list. Mark > > Mark > > >> >> On 23 October 2017 at 17:30, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Or the other way around. Release and update to Java 7... >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Wow, 2 years since the last release of [pool]. I plan on updating to Java >>>> 7 and push out a release. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
