Hi Mark, Thank you for your response and sorting this out. At first the page was nominated for deletion again, even with your answer and pointing to the License. After some time she changed her mind because she took an actual look on the website.
For everyone else working on this task, Wikipedia works in the way when you are using a sentence from the project its websites, you have to specifically mention the website is licensed under the Apache License as well. For an example, see "External links" on [1] : "*Prose in this article was copied from this source, which is released under an Apache License, Version 2.0.*" Thanks Mark! Roy [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Celix 2018-03-22 9:33 GMT+00:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > Roy, > > I spoken with the editor concerned [1] and it should be possible for you > to recreate the Apache Celix page and any other pages that that editor > removed. > > For future reference in case it helps you or others: > > The content of all of our web sites is licensed under the Apache > License, version 2 unless explicitly stated otherwise. I can't think of > any examples of alternative licencing off the top of my head but there > might be a few instances somewhere. > > The ALv2 permits re-use (see sections 2 and 4 in particular). > > While section 6 of the ALv2 may appear to prevent the use of logos, it > does not prevent nominative use [2] and our policy explicitly calls out > using the logo in an article to refer to the project as being OK [3]. > > HTH, > > Mark > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RHaworth > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#principles > [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#guidelines > > > On 20/03/18 20:32, Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I also started with this task. What should one do to keep the pages to > > exist? > > > > * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Celix > > * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apache_Celix.png > > * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Zeppelin > > * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apache_Zeppelin.png > > > > And this is going on for all the pages. > > > > The response: Looking at the license, material created using the software > > is released under license. But the license does not appear to extend to > > their webpages, logos, and so on. Asking for pages to be created is not > the > > same thing as releasing copyright material under a compatible license. > > > > Even when using the main project sentence which explains the project > which > > is stored in the official README in the GitHub repository mirror a > > complaint is filed: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Zeppelin > > > > What is probably the best way to resolve this, as the information put on > > Wikipedia should match the Apache TLP its website. > > > > Roy > > > > 2018-03-15 18:40 GMT+00:00 Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>: > > > >> What I would recommend as a starting point is to go to the Apache > Software > >> Foundation wikipedia page, and stub in links to all of the projects that > >> are listed at projects.apache.org > >> > >> > >> On 03/15/2018 05:29 AM, THE THE wrote: > >> > >>> I would like to help out with the task listed at > >>> https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?0b349bee > >>> > >>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >> > >> > > > >
