I made a bunch of perturbations and undid them and eventually the links are working as-is... So anyhow this is good to review or publish if you are happy with it.
Kenn On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:35 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! I've revised to take it into account. I'll try to > reply inline to indicate how. > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:02 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 10:35 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:51 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < >> bdelacre...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >... Feel free to draft your blog post and we can then review and >> publish! >> > I've drafted it.... >> >> Thank you, I reviewed [1] and it looks great to me! >> >> I have just 3 minor comments: >> >> -Add a link to the committer guidelines that you mention >> > > The first sentence of the paragraph on that was a link. Something about my > source is making most links not render. I got this one working, but many > others are not. I'll figure that out... > > >> -IIUC when you say "Every ~month" it means "about every month" - that >> was not obvious to me initially >> > > Changed to "about every month" > > >> -for RTC and CTR you might link to >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html > > > Done (but link is not yet working per above) > > >> >> -Bertrand > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:11 PM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I realize that this message might be hard to read since copy/paste >> formatting is gone. So here goes my attempt to clarify... >> >> On Jan 7, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Kenn, >> >> Thanks for contributing this. I think it's a nice introduction to Beam's >> community building efforts. >> >> Here are a couple of comments: >> >> > We want our contributor-base (hence committer-base) to be more spread >> across companies and backgrounds, for the usual Apache reasons. >> >> I'd elaborate instead of saying "for the usual Apache reasons". Which >> reasons are important to Beam? >> > > Done. > > >> > (we have committers from community development, tech writing, training, >> etc). >> >> I'd make this a sentence of its own. >> > > Agree. Done. > > > >> > you shouldn't be proposing a committer for other reasons, >> >> I don't understand "for other reasons". >> >> > Every ~month, we call for new discussions and revisit ~all prior >> discussions. >> >> I find the "~" to be distracting. Words please. >> > > Done. > > > For a potential committer, we did this: >> >> It's not clear to me when a person becomes a potential committer. Is it >> in the "repeat contributor" phase? >> >> > For an early contributor, >> >> Perhaps move this paragraph above the "For a potential committer" >> paragraph? >> > > Done. I think re-ordering and slight rephrase helped. > > > ~3~4 obvious committer candidates > > >> As above, remove "~". >> > > Done. "a few" > > > If we have no feedback about which guidelines were a concern, that is a >> red flag that we are being driven by bias. >> >> I don't understand this. Lack of concern might be considered a "good >> thing" not a red flag. >> > > Rephrased: "Formulating this feedback is important for helping > contributors to learn, but it also serves as a check against bias and > politics. If we found ourselves unable to specify such feedback, that is a > sign that we are deciding for a reason other than those we have declared > and agreed upon." > > > as RMS says >> >> Who/what <https://teams.googleplex.com/u/what> is RMS? >> > > Rephrased and spelled out his name. > > I'll keep trying to figure out what is going on with the links, and if you > know the answer please share it! > > Kenn > > >> >> Regards, >> >> Craig >> >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org <mailto: >> k...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Here it is: >> >> >> https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/preview/comdev/?previewEntry=an-approach-to-community-building >> < >> https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/preview/comdev/?previewEntry=an-approach-to-community-building >> > >> >> >> >> Kenn >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:44 PM Griselda Cuevas <g...@google.com.invalid >> > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Where could we find it? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 13:35, Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:51 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < >> >>>> bdelacre...@apache.org> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Feel free to draft your blog post and we can then review and >> publish! >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I've drafted it. It is pretty long but still feels terse to me. >> Feedback >> >>>> very welcome on that point. I will try to find time to give it >> another >> >>>> pass, unless someone tells me that it is fine as-is. >> >>>> >> >>>> Kenn >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -Bertrand >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> > Craig L Russell >> > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >> > c...@apache.org <mailto:c...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo < >> http://db.apache.org/jdo> >> >> Craig L Russell >> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >> c...@apache.org <mailto:c...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo < >> http://db.apache.org/jdo> >> >