On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:48 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:

> Sander's Email below, on board@, created some discussion,
>

I aim to please :)


> and after some thought I am leaning towards a couple of thoughts:
>
>   o That this is an ideal job for ComDev
>   o That this is something I'd like to volunteer to take on
>
> Think of it as an ASF school newspaper or newsletter...
>
> Comments? Thoughts?
>

The only thing I would caution is that I expect this to be a significant
continuing time commitment.  If that was taken into consideration, great.

Cheers,

Sander

> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Sander Striker <s.stri...@striker.nl>
> *Subject: **Organizational scaling, Internal communications*
> *Date: *September 11, 2019 at 3:20:15 PM EDT
> *To: *Apache Board <bo...@apache.org>
> *Reply-To: *bo...@apache.org
>
> Hi,
>
> Over the years the Foundation has grown a lot.  From the low tens, we're
> now in the high hundreds of Members.  With scale, some properties of the
> communication channels change, which makes them less effective than they
> used to be.
> Case in point is the members@ list.  It's been a while that everyone on
> the list knew each other personally, and when it was ok to share your
> insert-life-changing-event-like-having-a-kid-or-getting-merried on the list.
> Having a discussion on-list, and getting effectively everyone's opinion is
> a lot harder nowadays.  Or even knowing that your opinion was already
> represented.  Even when everyone paces themselves and doesn't post multiple
> times a day, there is a large group of people that finds it hard to keep up.
>
> During hallway conversations at ApacheCon, it was brought up that we don't
> really have anyone focussed on internal communication.  Given the size we
> are at, we could do with someone do neutral summaries with a limited
> frequency, so that interested members can keep up and stay involved more
> reasonably.  I think the Board would be able to benefit from this as well.
>
> Might be worth exploring.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sander
>
>
>

Reply via email to