1) if rather build my own badge software from scratch for the ASF badge use
specifically.

It is indeed a software project, and yes you’ve fully misunderstood as you
mentioned, WADR.

Whether or not infra decides to use the software will be based on the
usefulness of the Podling PoC for the new badge technology specifically for
ASF badges. If someone wants to fork and resubmit or take it to GitHub
whatever that’s fine, but the original purpose is for the ASF badge
specifically.

Should I cc them or present it on their list separately?

New podling, new software, yes.

Does this change your -1?


On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 8:04 AM Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 4/6/21 10:57 AM, Matthew Sacks wrote:
> > I’m not sure wtf it doing but this GT relying on the elder buffers and
> more
> > experienced guidance (specifically Mark Thomas, JimJag’s input, Brett
> > Porter) here goes: can we vote yes or no should this be turned into a
> > proposal of some kind, incubator or other, depending on where it is most
> > appropriated.
> >
> > Calling a vote yes or no to create a formal application for project
> hosting
> > in the ASF for the PoC.
> >
> > PoC success criteria TBD.
> >
> > I’ve proposed one podling before, but I’m rusty on this process.
> >
> > Ready to dedicate resources to this project.
>
> -1 - this is not podling material. Podlings are for software project to
> be hosted at the Foundation. This is not a software project. It is
> standing up a service with an existing externally-developed software
> project - unless I am completely misunderstanding what you're trying to
> do here.
>
> What I understood from the entire thread is that you wish to run a badge
> service, using Badgr (or other similar existing software project).
>
> Have I completely misunderstood your intent?
>
> If you do, in fact, intend to start a *new* software project to develop
> a badge solution, and make that an Apache project, this is not the place
> to have that conversation. That would be over on the Incubator mailing
> list.
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com
> @rbowen
>
-- 
Thank you, Matthew

Reply via email to