I’d love to know who the specific people are that I should reach out to per Apache project to discuss collaboration around events, promotions of our projects, etc.
If the answer to the above is “write to their mailing list” or “everyone”, etc, then no that’s not what I mean. Without a single point of advocacy contact per project, which would be 100% different to the current fragmented state, we will continue in the same way as before in the current fragmented state. Also happy to do this outside Apache if needed, e.g., Foojay.io which I am heavily involved in, but ideally we could achieve this within Apache and, no, not within current structures etc etc etc, but in a new way, please. Gj On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 19:44, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > Speaking of being ambassador - very much yes to do it, very much no to > "official status" of being one (since I was called by Rich). > IMHO. You are an ambassador or "evangelist" because you do it not because > you have a "title" to do it. There is absolutely no benefit or entitlement > of being appointed as an ambassador. > If you do it, and do it well, you will be known as an ambassador. What else > is needed? Why do you need a title? > > J. >
