Another thing I would be interested in: Is Tidelift continuing with the practice to select which projects are worth providing support for?
Just asking, because we don’t just have the big projects everyone knows, but also a load of small ones. My experience with trying to get PLC4X listed with Tidelift was catastrophic. Chris From: Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> Date: Sunday, 6. November 2022 at 22:41 To: dev@community.apache.org <dev@community.apache.org> Subject: Re: Tidelift Yep. That's one of the main "DON'Ts" that are going to be there. On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 9:03 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > ...I personally have no problem having a project support page > > that lists the individuals who accept GitHub sponsorships. Likewise I > > think it would be OK to list the people who are accepting sponsorship > from > > Tidelift.... > > +1, and IMO such pages should include a disclaimer that there's no > guarantee that the contributions of sponsored committers will be > accepted by the project, like at [1] maybe. > > That's obvious for ASF community members, but maybe not for their sponsors. > > -Bertrand > > [1] https://community.apache.org/committers/funding-disclaimer.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >
