I like release and develop. FWIW, a lot of Apache Commons components use
release already.

Gary

On Sun, Apr 2, 2023, 11:06 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There are many projects, where “main” contains the latest released version
> and „develop“ is for development.
> Others use “main” for development and something else for releases.
>
> That’s why I’m suggesting naming the threads according to what they are
> used for.
>
> “main” for a developer is probably the branch he does his most work on
> (aka “develop”).
> “main” for a user is probably the branch that he uses for using the
> framework (aka “release”).
>
> With “release” and “develop” I think it’s absolutely clear what is on
> which branch.
>
> That was why I suggested it.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: tison <wander4...@gmail.com>
> Datum: Sonntag, 2. April 2023 um 14:18
> An: dev@community.apache.org <dev@community.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch?
> > Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one that
> contains the released versions "releases". With "main" you never really
> know what it's used for.
>
> To me, "main" is always "develop".
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> sebb <seb...@gmail.com> 于2023年4月2日周日 19:34写道:
>
> > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 09:39, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to make a slightly different proposal.
> > > Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one
> that
> > contains the released versions "releases". With "main" you never really
> > know what it's used for.
> >
> > I agree that main is no less ambiguous than master, but the website
> > does not really have a development/release cycle, so I'm not sure
> > 'release' is appropriate here.
> >
> > Maybe the default branch should be something like 'production' or
> > 'live' for websites.
> > However that would mean changing the other repos to keep in step.
> >
> > > But I think I brought this up multiple times before, so if be +1 on a
> > change.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2023 10:19:44 AM
> > > To: dev@community.apache.org <dev@community.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch?
> > >
> > > +1 for it.
> > >
> > > Willem Jiang
> > >
> > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 8:11 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All bar one of the 4 comdev Git repos use 'main' as the default
> branch.
> > > >
> > > > I think we should standardise on that going forward, and change the
> > > > default branch for comdev-site.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed?
> > > >
> > > > Sebb
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to