Absolutely, I'll wait until dev rooms are announced to submit just a plain old talk :)
On Sat, Oct 3, 2026 at 3:03 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > And BTW. I also welcome co-organisers especially those who have > demonstrable experience with maintainer-focused AI - assisted efforrts > > J. > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2026, 12:00 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just one comment from vacations since devrooms deadline submission is > > tomorrow. > > > > I believe (I only co-organised AI low level hacking devroom so far) - > > FOSDEM organisers are usually accepting 'generic' devrooms - not tied > with > > particular organisations. So you might have a better chance of getting it > > accepted if you do not frame it as ASF-only or ASF should not be > mentioned > > at all. This is the direction (and honest desire of mine) for the 'AI for > > maintainers' devroom. I honestly want to listen to many people and > > approaches they took on how AI can be used to help maintainers in their > OSS > > journey. > > > > So maybe a better idea is to rephrase it to something more generic like > AI > > use in OSS organisations in general. > > > > Just a thought that might help to frame it better. > > > > J. > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2026, 19:21 Andrew Musselman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, I saw Rich's thread about stands, and Jarek's note that he > >> submitted a dev room proposal for "AI for maintainers." > >> > >> Anyone else submitting dev room ideas for the ASF? Another one I'll put > >> in is "AI at the ASF," which would cover everything from Magpie and > >> Sourcelume, to llm.apache.org, Gofannon, and Memory, the whole RAI > >> package. > >> > >> By end of January we might have evals (Touchstone) and ASF-originated > >> models (Frontier) to talk about, who knows. > >> > >> Best > >> Andrew > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> >
