> On Nov 1, 2026, at 9:42 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2026 at 16:39, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 31, 2026, at 5:27 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2026 at 19:01, Dave Fisher via dev
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> A couple of notes to add here:
>>>> 
>>>> ATR could provide derived DOAP files in the catalog if asked.
>>> 
>>> It would be useful to be able to fetch individual entries, rather than
>>> having to download the combined catalog.
>>> Also, the release data section is going to grow and grow, and is not
>>> needed by all consumers, so it would be useful to be able to exclude
>>> that.
>> 
>> If the release section only has active releases this will only be bad if the 
>> project is not archiving releases. There are a few that don’t.
> 
> At present, even releases for Attic projects are included.
> There are nearly 250,000 release entries for 1,500 projects.
> 
> In the case of DOAPs, there was no expectation that archived releases
> would be removed.
> 
> If the release catalog is intended to replace DOAPs, what happens to
> the archived releases?

The catalog contains archived releases. Perhaps you should explore the static 
website.

1. Home - https://release-catalog.apache.org/index.html
2. Example project - https://release-catalog.apache.org/airflow/index.html
3. Attic (may need additional seeding) - 
https://release-catalog.apache.org/attic/index.html
4. Incubator - https://release-catalog.apache.org/incubator/index.html

Please feel free to provide feedback to the tooling team via GH issues or 
[email protected]

Best,
Dave

> 
>>> It might be better to provide the release data as a separate download.
>>> i.e. one or more downloads for the largely static data, and a separate
>>> set for the ongoing release data.
>> 
>> We are publishing CLE documents in the catalog about a project’s release 
>> lifecycle: 
>> https://ecma-international.org/publications-and-standards/standards/ecma-428/
>> 
>>> 
>>>> We should probably make sure that we have an agreed mechanism for 
>>>> maintaining both Categories and Languages lists.
>>> 
>>> Also it might be useful to include a notice/comment in the file with
>>> details on where to maintain the source data.
>> 
>> We may have a feature gap which the tooling team will discuss next week.
> 
> There are several errors I noticed in the data - where is this held?
> And where are changes recorded?
> 
>> Best,
>> Dave
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 31, 2026, at 9:47 AM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi, Rich:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you add ActionScript to the code categories, and UI to the 'what kind
>>>>> of problems do you enjoy working on'? I am unable to make either Flex or
>>>>> Royale appear in the search process.
>>>>> 
>>>>> a
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andrew Wetmore
>>>>> Assistant VP, Marketing and Publicity, The ASF <https://apache.org>
>>>>> Editor-Writer, Infra team, The ASF
>>>>> 
>>>>> Editor, moosehousepress.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 8:27 AM Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2026, 19:56 sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2026 at 22:09, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2026, 17:44 sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I had not realized that ATR metadata included categories and
>>>>>>> programming languages etc as per the DOAPs.
>>>>>>> In which case I agree, the DOAPs could be dropped if not otherwise
>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes, ATR initially loaded their data from those DOAP files, but do not
>>>>>> continue to reference them unless you explicitly make a reference to them
>>>>>> in your asf.yaml file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> However, it requires a login to even view the data.
>>>>>>> Also the DOAPs include the data in a single file, whereas it looks
>>>>>>> like ATR only exposes the data via the HTML page.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm pulling it from the projects.json file that they publish.
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to