On 31/07/2008, at 3:54 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The more I think about it, the current (x) really signifies the right
thing, but the way it is treated needs to be improved as you've
described.
WDYT?
You mean putting the error in the session? I think if there is a
transient
error then we put it into session so that even if you leave the group
summary page while it's still updating/checking out and an svn failure
occur, it's still possible to show the (x) and the error message.
But once
you leave the page again or make a refresh, the error will be gone
( we
removed the error from the session once it is displayed ) and the
status
will be the previous status of the project.
Sorry, no - I still think we should track it on the server (it's still
relevant until it's fixed) - just not as part of the build history for
the project.
I think we used to have a separate checkout error field on the project
- it is probably a generalisation of that?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
