Commit them to trunk and merge them back? Trunk hasn't changed. I don't like maintaining branches either, but I like releases being blocked by snapshot dependencies even less.
To allow people to develop against snapshots of other projects, and still be able to release, somebody has to be on a branch. I volunteer. :) -- Wendy On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. > Nice I have some more jobs to commit my local changes to this new branch :-(. > > -- > Olivier > > 2008/8/29 Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> It's intended for the 1.2.x series. (It looks like trunk will move on >> with 1.3 or 2.0.) >> >> I followed up the Versioning Continuum releases thread with my >> thoughts. We can always change it if I'm way off base. :) >> >> -- >> Wendy >> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I don't understand here. >>> This branch is for the 1.2 release or for 1.2.1 ? >>> >>> -- >>> Olivier >>> >>> 2008/8/29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> Author: wsmoak >>>> Date: Fri Aug 29 09:09:34 2008 >>>> New Revision: 690310 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690310&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> Branch for Continuum 1.2 at r689851 >>>> >>>> Added: >>>> continuum/branches/continuum-1.2.x/ >>>> - copied from r689851, continuum/trunk/ >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
