On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 21/04/2009, at 5:34 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > I'll slowly start to plow through the unscheduled bucket :) I'm hoping we >> can kill 50 or more that are duplicates/fixed/etc. and get back to a small >> unscheduled bucket we can be responsive to. >> > > So far, I've already killed about 80. I'm halfway through. The ones I've > closed, I haven't done a lot to link them to when they were fixed (they may > be dupes, or stuff might have been done without issues - eitehr way I didn't > want to modify historical release notes). Some things that have just not had > interest got closed as well. > > Basic approach to scheduling: > - if it blocks a 1.3 GA, or is some reasonable flaw in new functionality, > or a regression, it's in 1.3.3 (that might be split into another beta > release though) > - if it's something that looks like the very near term or has patches, into > 1.4.0 or 1.4.x > - everything else into 1.x that is still relevant > > Hope this is ok... sorry about all the mail :) It is ok, thanks Emmanuel > > > Cheers, > Brett >
