cool, thanks!
On 19/05/2009, at 12:37 AM, Marica Tan wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]>
wrote:
HI Marica,
On 19/05/2009, at 12:07 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Author: ctan
Date: Mon May 18 14:07:51 2009
New Revision: 775961
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=775961&view=rev
Log:
[CONTINUUM-1712] added jpox project summary to improve performance
of
group summary page
merge -r 775955:775956 of 1.3.x branch
sounds like a good idea. I'm wondering, do we know of the cause
that it
slowed down? If the project requests have a misconfigured fetch
group it
might affect the overall performance of the system, not just the
front page.
I think it just something to do with having a large number of project
groups and projects.
But we may need to investigate this some more just to be sure.
Modified: continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view-
models.mdo
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view-models.mdo?rev=775961&r1=775960&r2=775961&view=diff
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
====================================================================
--- continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view-models.mdo
(original)
+++ continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view-models.mdo
Mon May
18 14:07:51 2009
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@
<required>true</required>
<description>number of successful builds in the project
group</description>
<type>int</type>
- <defaultValue>-1</defaultValue>
+ <defaultValue>0</defaultValue>
</field>
<field>
<name>numFailures</name>
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
<required>true</required>
<description>number of failed builds in the project
group</description>
<type>int</type>
- <defaultValue>-1</defaultValue>
+ <defaultValue>0</defaultValue>
</field>
<field>
<name>numErrors</name>
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
<required>true</required>
<description>number of errored builds in the project
group</description>
<type>int</type>
- <defaultValue>-1</defaultValue>
+ <defaultValue>0</defaultValue>
</field>
<field>
<name>repositoryId</name>
I'm not sure how this is relevant to the change? Does this change
have any
other impact?
Other classes that uses this class also sets the initial values of
these
fields to 0 so no impact.
- Brett
