I'm not likely to be the one doing most of the work, and it doesn't really look like we'll have competing branches that we'll have to decide between, so it's fine with me. :)
Re: the problem of merging to trunk... I don't see that happening. If a branch shapes up to be Continuum 2.0, I'd expect that we just _move_ it to trunk. But again if those that are doing the work want to do it on "trunk" rather than "continuum-NEXT", go for it! They're all just directories in Subversion that can be moved around at any time we decide to. -- Wendy On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Emmanuel Venisse<[email protected]> wrote: > I'd prefer to decide what will be Continuum 2.0. I won't like to start to > work on a new architecture if we aren't sure because we'll spend lot of time > to write a POC, so personnaly, I'd prefer to start directly in trunk. ...
