Thanks, Emmanuel! I think I saw one commit already last week... is it related to this work?
I'd like to gather this up under a JIRA issue, so I'll open a generic performance improvements issue if there isn't one already. -- Wendy On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Emmanuel Venisse<emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I'm on the good way, I found some methods that are very aggressive > with the DB and load lot of build results (all build results for each build > and the project group page) in memory to find some values. This part use lot > of cpu and memory. > > I need to refactor them to get minimal datas from the DB so the result would > be better. I hope to do it for the end of the week. > > Emmanuel > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Marc Lustig <m...@marclustig.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> Emmanuel Venisse-2 wrote: >> > >> > I'll continue to review the code and when I'll think it is ok, I'll ping >> > you. >> > Will you be able to test a Continuum snapshot on your big DB? >> > >> >> yes, no problem. Let me know where to download the snapshot and I will test >> it. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Profiling-results-for-Continuum-tp24142787p24219393.html >> Sent from the Continuum - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >
