As somebody from Lattix, we will be happy to provide you with a license. Lattix will allow you to analyze your system and will also let you make changes to it to see the impact of those changes. Emmanuel, I appreciate your perspective; I will be happy to do a demonstration for you over the web and hear what you don't like about Lattix.
Neeraj Sangal Emmanuel Venisse-2 wrote: > > It is a good thing to analyze the architecture and if possible to > automated > it. > > other tools are: > - Latttix but it seems to be very poor > - xdepend, this tool seems to be very good but I'm not sure it generate > architecture diagram > > We can get a free license for each of them. > Emmanuel > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Since we're talking about making architectural changes, I wonder how >> close we really are to the "now" diagram on >> http://continuum.apache.org/ref/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT/architecture.html ? >> >> I tried looking at Continuum with Structure101 late last year, but >> didn't get very far because the packages are still split between >> org.apache.maven.continuum and org.apache.continuum. What I _could_ >> see tells me that we have a some dependencies between modules that >> really shouldn't be allowed to talk to each other. :) >> >> Recently I've been trying this again with SonarJ, which the nice folks >> at Hello2morrow have provided a license for. With this tool, you >> define your own layers and rules about which layers are allowed to >> communicate, and then it shows you where the dependencies are. >> >> I would really like to define the new architecture and use automated >> tools to make sure we adhere to it (or at least know when we aren't). >> >> Thoughts on this in general? Any other tools we should evaluate? >> >> -- >> Wendy >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Continuum-architecture-management-tp24205210p24760839.html Sent from the Continuum - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
