On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Marica Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the reasons why it needs to have a previous successful build are: > > > > 1. to make sure there is a working copy > > You don't need to build to have a working copy, just check out. > > We could add a check to see if the working copy exists. If it doesn't then do a checkout. > > 2. to make sure we have a successful build before we tag. there is no > sense > > to release a project if the build failed because the release will fail as > > well. > > There's no relationship between a successful build in the past and a > successful release now. A commit in between could have fixed (or > broken) the build, giving a different result when you try to release. > > This feels like an arbitrary restriction that could be removed. > > Yes, I agree. > -- > Wendy > -- Marica
