On 15/03/2010, at 10:34 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Deng Ching <[email protected]> wrote: >> Should we label 1.3.6 as a Beta release? > > Brett suggested having a separate quality vote? I think in the past > we've just voted once for release and quality.
I actually prefer it be part of the vote thread itself, or a discussion before the vote starts - that was just a suggestion since it came up in the middle of the thread and I didn't want to interrupt it. > > I'm fine with calling it GA and will vote +1 (with reservations). The > issues that are bothering me are really too big to change on the > branch anyway, they're going to require model changes. Yep, that's was my understanding as well that got captured in the roadmap page. > > One option, since it's already been announced as Beta, is to leave it > in the wild for a week or so and if no major issues are reported > against it we can vote it up to GA quality. That's fine with me too... > > We really, really, need to get rid of the branch. +1 - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
