That just makes too much sense. Sounds good. On Oct 14, 2013 9:54 PM, "Brett Porter" <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> I fixed the issue since it was easy to do. I think we can reasonably > continue Java 5 support for Continuum 1.4.x, with the caveat that the > standalone install comes with Jetty 8, which requires Java 6. > > For working on Continuum 1.5 or above, I'd certainly be happy for anyone > to bump the minimum requirement to either Java 6 or 7, depending on what > they need. > > On 03/10/2013, at 9:58 AM, Louis Smith <dr.louis.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree with the removal of 5.. I think we might even want to start > > suggesting 7... 8 is at full feature with GA due in the spring. > > > > I know I have been facing J7 issues with other products - so I don't see > > any reason to hold back if any of the dependencies have already started > to > > move up. > > > > Louis > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Brent Atkinson <brent.atkin...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> Greetings dev, > >> > >> The root cause of > >> CONTINUUM-2712<https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2712>, > >> is not clear at the moment, but when responding to it I couldn't help > but > >> wonder if we might want to update the installation instructions on the > web > >> site to suggest using Java 6 or later. > >> > >> If it turns out to be caused by a dependency continuum uses that is > built > >> with Java 6 or later, I am even more inclined to remove references to > using > >> Java 5. It is at end-of-life and will only become more common moving > >> forward. > >> > >> Brent > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Louis Smith, ThD > > Chief Technology Officer, Kyra InfoTech > > Museum Director, Veterans Memorial Railroad > > -- > Brett Porter @brettporter > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > >
