Thanks for your quick reply Don, really appreciate it. On 12/13/12 1:35 PM, "Don Coleman" <don.cole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >I restarted that server. > >I'm working with Fil to get other people admin access on the server until >we get a better solution. > > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Filip Maj ><f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >CC'ing Don. Don, any chance you can hook our committers up with the jitsu >instance creds so we can fix some stuff? Might be a good idea to post this >as a direct reply to me, or the cordova-private list. > >On 12/13/12 1:16 PM, "Braden Shepherdson" <bra...@chromium.org> wrote: > >>-1 to local servers. >> >>I don't know about everyone else, but Google's wireless network setup >>makes >>hitting a server running on your laptop from a phone hard or impossible. >>Getting the existing server back up until Apache INFRA can host it for us >>sounds better to me. >> >>Braden >> >> >>On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I suppose we could use node. Ideally to test locally the Apache >>>instance >>> should run node and the same node script as well.... (another hurdle?) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Use node? >>> > >>> > On 12/13/12 12:08 PM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >Precisely your last comment about INFRA being open ;) Don't know if >>>we >>> can >>> > >wait that long... >>> > > >>> > >If the server scripts are in mobile-spec already, running the python >>> > >server >>> > >wouldn't be (much of) a problem as a backup method, but then I >>>suppose >>> on >>> > >Windows you would need to install python also. I can see the hassle >>>but >>> at >>> > >least its only once... >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> Yeah, but asking testers to run a server every time they run >>> mobile-spec >>> > >> might be a bit much. If a constant server is run on apache infra >>>that >>> > >>will >>> > >> respond to HTTP requests that would probably be better. >>> > >> >>> > >> The INFRA folk are starting to loathe me, I think, with my >>>constant >>> > >> pestering and offhand critiques, so we'll see how open they are to >>> this >>> > >> idea :) >>> > >> >>> > >> On 12/13/12 11:50 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> >That would be great. I suppose if we could run it locally in the >>> > >>meantime >>> > >> >off the same server scripts, the better (who knows if a server >>>goes >>> > >>down). >>> > >> >One less dependency I suppose >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> >>>wrote: >>> > >> > >>> > >> >> Why don't we get Apache INFRA to set up a simple instance like >>>this >>> > >>for >>> > >> >> us? This way it's not tied to any one person. I can ask INFRA >>>about >>> > >>it. >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> On 12/13/12 11:37 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >It's erroring out for mobile-spec testing. >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> >I'm wondering if we could just run a local server for the >>> > >>FileTransfer >>> > >> >> >tests instead - if the server was in python we could just >>>invoke >>> > >>this >>> > >> >>on >>> > >> >> >the mobile-spec folder: >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> >python -m SimpleHTTPServer >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
