Can we stop creating tasks for updating the www if it has not changed? All of these items are invalid. Creating these tasks means that ~8 different people need to go and look at app-hello-world and decide whether it actually needs to be updated.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > The JIRa issues for tagging are now up. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2115 > > > On 1/2/13 10:15 AM, "Steven Gill" <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Lets tag this week! > > > >On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> Early JAN release it is! I went into holiday mode early :P > >> > >> On 12/20/12 12:35 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> >Here's the chance to prove it doesn't take a week. Let's release 2.3.0 > >>! > >> >Today! > >> > > >> >Cheers, > >> > Jesse > >> > > >> > > >> >On 2012-12-19, at 12:05 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >I would like to push 2.3.0 out before the break as well, before the > >>end of > >> >the week. > >> >2.3.0 adds support for WP8, and while it IS currently available in > >>rc2, it > >> >would be nice if it was available as part of the download from > >> >phonegap.com, > >> >which means a release. As it is, Microsoft and I will have several > >>blog > >> >posts and videos alluding to 2.3.0 + WP8 but no link to go get it. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Michael brought this up yesterday w/ the suggestion that we make > >> >> cutting a release even easier still by including a standard ./release > >> >> script (actually he suggested ./configure but I think that convention > >> >> might come w/ unintended baggage). > >> >> > >> >> I'm not convinced the speed issue w/ cutting a release is the actual > >> >> compile/compose we do today---but it would make the Coho tool > >> >> significantly dumber which would make it way easier for downstream > >> >> distributions to live w/ what we do. > >> >> > >> >> I'm realizing--this warrants a new thread---I'll kick that up. > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> >> > Actually, given that it takes us a week to actually do a release, I > >> >> > don't think we can get the final release out by the end of the > >>week, > >> >> > even though it appears activity on the repositories is slowing > >>down. > >> >> > :S > >> >> > > >> >> > I'll have to agree to a January release. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> It's getting awfully close to a break. I'm heading out on vacation > >> >> >> tomorrow. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> How do people feel about letting rc2 simmer over the break and > >> >>releasing > >> >> >> 2.3 first thing January? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 12/19/12 10:10 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>>Can we start tagging the release today? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Marcel Kinard > >><cmarc...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> >>>> +1, FWIW. I'd like to see 2.3.0 out before the break. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> -- Marcel Kinard > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> On 12/17/2012 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Hey > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> How about Wednesday/Thursday for tagging 2.3.0 final? I know > >> >>that we > >> >> >>>>> haven't fully released 2.3.0rc2, but I know that many, if not > >>the > >> >> >>>>> majority of the committers are going to be on holiday at the > >>end > >> >>of > >> >> >>>>> this week and it would be good if we could get 2.3.0 out before > >> >> break. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Thoughts? > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Joe > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> >@purplecabbage > >> >risingj.com > >> > >> > > -- @purplecabbage risingj.com
