aha! Okay, did a pull and using the cordova.ios.js from cordova-ios it now breaks.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS 2.5.0rc1 it still > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it all passes. I > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and 2.5.0rc1 of > > mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results as I had > (both > > in Simulator and device as well). > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org > >wrote: > > > >> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on simulator) > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > This morning I did git pull apache next for mobile-spec and got > this: > >> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603 > >> > Fast-forward > >> > VERSION | 2 +- > >> > autotest/tests/file.tests.js | 14 ++++++++++---- > >> > autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> > cordova.js | 2 +- > >> > index.html | 1 + > >> > misc/index.html | 3 ++- > >> > misc/page2.html | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- > >> > splashscreen/index.html | 47 > >> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > >> > create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html > >> > > >> > Does that help? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet. Which > >> > > mob-spec version? I can verify. > >> > > > >> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an older version) > >> and > >> > I > >> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the tests > >> themselves. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com > >> > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output? Did you open > >> > remote > >> > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com > >> > > <javascript:;> > >> > > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to rule out > any > >> > > errors > >> > > > > due > >> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors as the > >> previous > >> > > two > >> > > > > > > devices. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron < > shaz...@gmail.com > >> > > <javascript:;> > >> > > > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22 mobile-spec > failures > >> (21 > >> > > > > related > >> > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and fix for a > >> re-tag. > >> > > The > >> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text file. Tested > on > >> an > >> > > > > iPhone 5 > >> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1, exact same > >> > failures. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong < > >> > > > > kingoftheo...@hotmail.com <javascript:;><javascript:;> > >> > > > > > > >wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1. > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> > >> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800 > >> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1? > >> > > > > > > >> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org <javascript:;> > <javascript:;> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess, wrapping > >> things > >> > up. > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser < > >> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > >> > > > > <javascript:;> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil. If we fail, > we > >> > fail > >> > > > > > > >> together!!!! > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip Maj < > >> > f...@adobe.com > >> > > <javascript:;> > >> > > > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1 tagging. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under the > javascript > >> > and > >> > > > > tagged > >> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right :s > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io > >> > > <javascript:;> > >> > > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this thing > >> > > tagged/bagged > >> > > > > > > today. > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj < > >> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;> > >> > > > > <javascript:;> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it. > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" < > >> bows...@gmail.com > >> > > <javascript:;> > >> > > > > <javascript:;>> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create the next > >> branch > >> > > now > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > > > >> throw > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that? > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
