Filed an INFRA ticket for ReviewBoard: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5889
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>wrote: > ReviewBoard seems like a great fit to me! Let's try it out! > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Brian M Dube <bd...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 01/21/2013 01:24 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> As for code reviews: >> >> >> >> I'd certainly be interested in more code-reviews. I think it's really >> >> useful to get feedback on changes. The only time when it becomes a >> burden >> >> is when turn-around time gets too long (e.g. you submit for review and >> no >> >> one looks at it for over a day). >> >> >> >> Up until now, we've been using the github pull-request interface to >> have >> >> others review our changes, but this isn't done very frequently. I also >> >> don't love this approach because comments through it don't get posted >> back >> >> to the cordova mailing-list. >> > >> > I'm not super thrilled by this either, because our GitHub pull request >> > system is completely broken since we can't actually close requests and >> > indicate when we think things are a good idea or not. I think we >> > should do what Android does with Gerrit (see >> > https://android-review.googlesource.com) , but that'll involve >> > additional infrastructure and another war with INFRA about whether >> > it's the Apache way or whatever. >> >> An instance of ReviewBoard [1] exists at Apache [2], so I don't think it >> means war about the Apache way. Is that something that could fill this >> need? >> >> Brian >> >> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/ >> [2] >> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the >> > >
