I think your prioritization is correct. It would be great to ship w/ our docs but no rush.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that's on my list of things to do. I'm making progress along that > list, but it's currently outrunning me. > > Do people like the idea of putting this doc into the docs.cordova.io docs? > Or do we prefer to keep contributor-related things in the wiki? If the > latter, it can wait, but if the former then I should probably commit it > very soon. > > Braden > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Braden also published this detailed guide for contributors on the topic: >> >> >> https://googledrive.com/host/0B8sLcyOAEX-XUHAxNXhISE5rTTg/guide_contributing_index.md.html >> >> (Which I'm guessing will make its way into our docs proper?) >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Alright folks, mobile-spec and cordova-js are tagged 2.6.0rc1, and the >> > 2.6.x branches on both those repos are now pushed up. Gogo release mode! >> > >> > On 3/21/13 9:12 AM, "James Jong" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>Nice. Thanks Michal. >> >> >> >>-James Jong >> >> >> >>On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Yes, the intent is to have living branches. We may also cherry-pick >> >>> regressions back to more than just the current release. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, James Jong <[email protected]> >> >>>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Thanks Braden. Is the intent to have 'living' branches for each major >> >>>> release (e.g. 2.6, 3.0) which contain tags for release candidates and >> >>>>minor >> >>>> revisions? So going forward we would have 2.6.x , 3.0.x, ... >> branches? >> >>>> >> >>>> -James Jong >> >>>> >> >>>> On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Braden Shepherdson <[email protected] >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> I meant to send an email about this last night. Here's the >> >>>>>(high-level) >> >>>>> process we'll need to follow for each of the repos. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Step 0: This time only, delete the 'next' branch. We're not using >> them >> >>>>> anymore, and they'll just add confusion. >> >>>>> Step 1: Checkout and pull master. >> >>>>> Step 2: git checkout -b 2.6.x (now you're on the new branch 2.6.x) >> >>>>> Step 3: tag 2.6.0.rc1 (on the 2.6.x branch) >> >>>>> Step 4: Push the branch and tag. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> NB: The branch is for the minor revision (ie. 2.6.x) not the point >> >>>> release >> >>>>> (2.6.0). The branch will have tags called 2.6.0rc1, 2.6.0rc2, etc. >> and >> >>>> then >> >>>>> 2.6.0. Any 2.6.1 that we do will be on this 2.6.x branch as well, >> just >> >>>>> adding more tags. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Remember that commits always land in master first. Regression fixes >> >>>> should >> >>>>> be cherry-picked to 2.6.x after being committed to master. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Braden >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, James Jong <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Is the new release branching process for 2.6 posted somewhere? I >> >>>>>>didn't >> >>>>>> see it searching through the emails. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -James Jong >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson < >> [email protected]> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> My changes are in. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Alright sounds like we need to wait on those pull reqs. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Braden, if you get it in time, great, otherwise, not a big deal. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Related: can someone recap the newer release/branching/tagging >> >>>> approach >> >>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>> talked about at the face-to-face (and let's decide if we want to >> >>>>>>>>use >> >>>> it >> >>>>>> or >> >>>>>>>> not)? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 3/20/13 9:20 AM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I'm trying to get CB-52 for FileTransfer upload/download and the >> >>>>>>>>> keyboardformaccessorybar re-fix in as well - also seeing if the >> >>>>>>>>> FileTransfer mobile-spec stuff works to test. Was planning on >> >>>>>>>>>pulling >> >>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>> the iOS pull requests but may not have time, but it seems Andrew >> >>>>>>>>>is >> >>>> on >> >>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>> already :) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Braden Shepherdson >> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm working on rolling some of the plugin JS loading logic into >> >>>>>>>>>> cordova-js. >> >>>>>>>>>> If that makes this release then it will be possible to play with >> >>>>>> plugman >> >>>>>>>>>> without also needing bleeding-edge JS. Note that this logic >> >>>>>>>>>>won't be >> >>>>>>>>>> active >> >>>>>>>>>> if there are no plugins, so it shouldn't be a high-risk change >> to >> >>>>>> slide >> >>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>> before a release. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrew Grieve < >> >>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Time's feeling right for a release. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm planning on going through pull requests today. Makes sense >> >>>>>>>>>>>to >> >>>> get >> >>>>>>>>>> those >> >>>>>>>>>>> all in before starting the release. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:49 AM, James Jong >> >>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> A couple of items I'd like to see get into 2.6: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Lorin's EXIF camera implementation >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) adding prompt dialog to the Notification API (completed, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>just >> >>>>>>>>>> needs >> >>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>> be merged in) >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/24 >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/21 >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/35 >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/35 >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-mobile-spec/pull/13 >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -James Jong >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ya braden put that huge thread on the list w/ the docs.. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haha have we even brought back the new method to the list >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>since >> >>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>> F2F? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/13 3:21 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, lets give this new method a go. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How we feeling for that? Are there any outstanding >> features >> >>>> out >> >>>>>>>>>>> there >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are on the cusp of landing, or can we go into rc + test >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mode >> >>>>>>>>>>> soon-ish? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> > >>
