This has all of my +1s. Especially if our testing story is a dependent plugin, this is way more convenient than two repos.
Braden On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm into it. > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Max Woghiren <[email protected]> wrote: > > The main technical ask here is the ability to specify a plugin as { git > > repo, commit hash, subdirectory } instead of just { git repo, commit > hash }. > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Would have the benefit of enabling a plugin, and plugin-test existence > >> in a single repo. Consolidates a lot of tooling. Lets discuss more > >> herein > >> >
