Yep, sounds good to me!

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Gorkem Ercan <[email protected]> wrote:

> I see your point... I have unified the template config.xmls on all
> platforms, perhaps it would be a better idea to differentiate the template
> config.xml per platform so that the values from other platforms are not
> spread to all... CLIs template can still carry the values of all platforms
> that is its purpose anyway. If that sounds fine I will update the PR.
> --
> Gorkem
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Gorkem Ercan <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Some feedback:
> > > >
> > > > +    <access origin=".*"/>
> > > > +    <access origin="http://127.0.0.1*"/> <!-- allow local pages
> -->`
> > > >
> > > > Why have the second line? it's made redundant by the first, and when
> we
> > > do
> > > > serve files locally, we do so via file: URLs.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I have copied this use from the android's existing config.xml [1]. It
> > does
> > > not make much sense to me either but since I did not have time to
> > > investigate it deeply and did not want to break anything, I kept it as
> it
> > > is. We can easily remove it if you think it will not harm anything for
> > > Android.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/master/framework/res/xml/config.xml
> >
> >
> > ah, okay. Yeah, I think it should just be removed.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +    <log level="DEBUG"/>
> > > >
> > > > I don't see <log> in the widget spec. Seems like a good idea to be
> able
> > > to
> > > > se a log level, but probably would be more appropriate as a
> > <preference>,
> > > > and out of the scope of this change.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Correct, this is not on the spec but Android at the moment is actually
> > > using log element to configure its logging level and therefore it is
> > > present on the current android config.xml. I also agree that logging is
> > not
> > > in the scope of this change and it is  probably a fair amount of work.
> If
> > > you think the effect on Android is trivial, I can remove it from the
> > > templates.
> > >
> > >
> > Cool, didn't know that. I think for now, let's at least keep this
> confined
> > to Android's config.xml then or convert it to a <preference> before we
> > expose it to other platforms.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Using <param> for the class name does more align with the spec, but
> > using
> > > > $platform-package to address platform differences seems out of place
> > > > compared with how these are addressed by CLI's config.xml (using
> > > > gap:platform attributes or <platform> tags). What would be better (I
> > > think)
> > > > would be to have <param name="package" value="foo"/>, and use
> > CLI/plugman
> > > > to deal with putting in the correct versions per platform.
> > > >
> > > > E.g., if iOS adds something to its template config.xml file, I don't
> > want
> > > > to have to add this value to each platform's config.xml file.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I wanted to keep it within the spec because any extensions to the
> widget
> > > spec needs a wider concencus . I used the $platform-package convention
> > but
> > > could be any of the other options as long as it allows us to mark the
> > > element with a platform. I think this is something that needs to be
> > agreed
> > > and continued.
> > >
> > >
> > I'm not so much focused on what the attribute is called, but rather I
> feel
> > more strongly that we shouldn't put iOS-specific things in Android's
> > config.xml and vice-versa. Reason being is that if you extrapolate this
> to
> > our ~10 platforms, that's a tonne of duplicated settings, and any tweak
> you
> > want to make to one, you need to then make in ~10 repositories.
> >
> > Instead, what we should do is move to using cordova-cli's config.xml be
> the
> > unified version:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-cli.git;a=blob;f=templates/www/config.xml;h=206bc5698780acda1863c4612cc36291a15b0472;hb=HEAD
> >
> > Note though that we don't have <feature> in here, since they are defined
> in
> > plugin.xml. e.g.:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/chrome-cordova/blob/master/plugins/socket/plugin.xml
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes please. I want to get this pain all over with :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sounds good!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ping Shaz, Andrew, Michal, Joe, Simon, and anyone else involved
> in
> > > > > Android
> > > > > > & iOS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/4/13 5:08 AM, "Gorkem Ercan" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Hi Filip,
> > > > > > >Thanks for looking at this. I have just updated the PR(s) with
> > > > corrected
> > > > > > >config.xml ids for templates on all projects.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I am also planning to send a PR for updates to doc once these
> are
> > > > > > >integrated.
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >Gorkem
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hey Gorkem,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks for this and putting the effort into kick starting
> this.
> > > > Sorry
> > > > > > >> about the late reply.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I like the changes (made a minor comment re: widget element id
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > > >> github pull request). Correctly adopting the spec should help.
> > > > > > >>Leveraging
> > > > > > >> several <param> elements inside a <feature> element, one param
> > per
> > > > > > >> platform, to describe the resolution of native plugin source
> > from
> > > > > > >> cordova.exec service label [1] is elegant.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I'm up for +1'ing these changes. Should help with our ongoing
> > > plugin
> > > > > > >> tooling work too!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Unless other people have problems with this approach, I'll aim
> > to
> > > > > merge
> > > > > > >> this stuff in on Friday. Perhaps some of the core maintainers
> > for
> > > > > > >>Android
> > > > > > >> and iOS can review those particular changes (I trust your
> > > judgement
> > > > > more
> > > > > > >> than my high-level understanding :P). If that all checks out,
> we
> > > can
> > > > > set
> > > > > > >> up issues for the Windows Phone platforms, BlackBerry, and
> other
> > > > > > >>platforms.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1]
> > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/41/files#L2R57
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 4/1/13 2:24 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >I would like this to be reviewed/merged as well because
> > > config.xml
> > > > > > >> >differences are becoming a pain in terms of plugin
> management.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >Android has a /cordova/plugins. iOS had a /cordova/plugins in
> > 2.4
> > > > and
> > > > > > >>now
> > > > > > >> >has a /widget/plugins.  BlackBerry 10 has a /widget/plugins
> and
> > > is
> > > > > > >> >following the spec by using "feature" instead of "plugin".
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >Whatever we decide I would like to have some kind of
> uniformity
> > > > > across
> > > > > > >> >platforms.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >-a
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Gorkem Ercan
> > > > > > >> ><[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> Hi All,
> > > > > > >> >> I am working on a set of plugins for Eclipse that will
> > > eventually
> > > > > be
> > > > > > >> >>part
> > > > > > >> >> of the JBoss IDE. I seem to have similar requirements to
> > > > > cordova-cli
> > > > > > >>and
> > > > > > >> >> noticed that some of the things that are planned for cli is
> > > well
> > > > > > >>aligned
> > > > > > >> >> with our plans. So I am hoping to contribute as much as I
> > can.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> We also use W3 widget packaging spec based config.xml as a
> > > > blanket
> > > > > to
> > > > > > >> >> configure a Cordova App for all platforms. However there
> are
> > > > > > >> >>differences on
> > > > > > >> >> the config.xml that each platform consumes compared to the
> W3
> > > > spec
> > > > > > >>and
> > > > > > >> >>as
> > > > > > >> >> you can imagine a more uniform platform behaviour makes our
> > > life
> > > > a
> > > > > > >>bit
> > > > > > >> >> better. So I have tried to take a shot at unifying the
> > > > differences
> > > > > > >> >>between
> > > > > > >> >> platforms and created pull requests for android[1]. iOS[2]
> > and
> > > > > > >>CLI[3]. I
> > > > > > >> >> think with these PRs JIRA[4] for migrating from <plugin> to
> > > > > <feature>
> > > > > > >> >> should be resolved (at least for iOS and Android) and its
> > > > parent[5]
> > > > > > >> >>should
> > > > > > >> >> be updated.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> The changes are compatible with the existing config.xmls on
> > iOS
> > > > and
> > > > > > >> >> Android, I think it will be even possible to mix and match
> > the
> > > > new
> > > > > > >> >>syntax
> > > > > > >> >> <feature> with the old ones.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/41
> > > > > > >> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/45
> > > > > > >> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/7
> > > > > > >> >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1109
> > > > > > >> >> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1108
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > >> >> Gorkem
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >Gorkem
> > > > > > >http://www.gorkem-ercan.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Gorkem
> > > http://www.gorkem-ercan.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Gorkem
> http://www.gorkem-ercan.com
>

Reply via email to