I am, sorry, I should have said so.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't believe Shaz is using the future branch. The future branch is > mostly untested, partly broken and under heavy development right now. Are > you using the future branch Michal ? > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Very odd, I just tried using the exact same syntax and even moved the tag > > to the same relative file location. Not working. > > > > Shaz, are you using the future branch? > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I was just playing with plugman yesterday with the Facebook Connect > > > plugin, it did however install my access tags that were in the > top-level: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-facebook-plugin/blob/plugman-FB-SDK-3.2.1/plugin.xml#L12-L16 > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Seems access tag does not work in top-level either. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > CB-3188 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> the access tag should be top-level (as a common practice) but it > > should > > >> >> work anyway....weird... > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Bug, file that shizzle yo > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On 4/18/13 12:19 PM, "Michal Mocny" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > >Anis/Fil: > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >I've got a plugin that contains the following in the ios > platform > > >> >> section: > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > <config-file target="config.xml" parent="/widget"> > > >> >> > > <access origin="chrome-extension://*" /> > > >> >> > > <content > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >src="chrome-extension://ohgfbmefaoadakchflddcopcmphnlcba/chromeapp.html" > > >> >> > >/> > > >> >> > > </config-file> > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >The content tag is being copied fine, but the access tag is not > > >> (!). I > > >> >> > >was > > >> >> > >under the impression that config-file would do a raw copy over > to > > >> >> platform > > >> >> > >config? Are we whitelisting/blacklisting tags somehow? Bug? > > User > > >> >> error? > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >-Michal > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
