Actually, the chrome mobile apps project has a bootstrap plugin which basically does that right now. We got lucky and the plugin content tag is appended after the app content tag, so we win :) Would love to see something less volatile.
-Michal On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. I think I tend to agree with that. Some app-level config.xml > elements (such as access tags) could be duplicated across multiple > plugins. `prepare` is aware of _all_ plugins installed in an app, so it > may make sense to move it in there. > > The content tag is an interesting one. What if two plugins want to change > the content entry point into an app? Heh. > > On 4/22/13 11:42 AM, "Michal Mocny" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >found it. CB-3188 updated. > > > >I think its another argument for moving more stuff out to prepare step. > > Essentially the plugman install time work is being overwritten on > >prepare. > > > > > >On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I am, sorry, I should have said so. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> > >>> I don't believe Shaz is using the future branch. The future branch is > >>> mostly untested, partly broken and under heavy development right now. > >>>Are > >>> you using the future branch Michal ? > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Very odd, I just tried using the exact same syntax and even moved the > >>> tag > >>> > to the same relative file location. Not working. > >>> > > >>> > Shaz, are you using the future branch? > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > I was just playing with plugman yesterday with the Facebook Connect > >>> > > plugin, it did however install my access tags that were in the > >>> top-level: > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap-facebook-plugin/blob/plugman-FB-SDK > >>>-3.2.1/plugin.xml#L12-L16 > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected] > > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > >> Seems access tag does not work in top-level either. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michal Mocny > >>><[email protected]> > >>> > >> wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > CB-3188 > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Anis KADRI > >>><[email protected]> > >>> > >> wrote: > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> >> the access tag should be top-level (as a common practice) but > >>>it > >>> > should > >>> > >> >> work anyway....weird... > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > Bug, file that shizzle yo > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > On 4/18/13 12:19 PM, "Michal Mocny" <[email protected]> > >>>wrote: > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > >Anis/Fil: > >>> > >> >> > > > >>> > >> >> > >I've got a plugin that contains the following in the ios > >>> platform > >>> > >> >> section: > >>> > >> >> > > > >>> > >> >> > > <config-file target="config.xml" parent="/widget"> > >>> > >> >> > > <access origin="chrome-extension://*" /> > >>> > >> >> > > <content > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > >>>>src="chrome-extension://ohgfbmefaoadakchflddcopcmphnlcba/chromeapp.html > >>>>" > >>> > >> >> > >/> > >>> > >> >> > > </config-file> > >>> > >> >> > > > >>> > >> >> > >The content tag is being copied fine, but the access tag is > >>>not > >>> > >> (!). I > >>> > >> >> > >was > >>> > >> >> > >under the impression that config-file would do a raw copy > >>>over > >>> to > >>> > >> >> platform > >>> > >> >> > >config? Are we whitelisting/blacklisting tags somehow? > >>>Bug? > >>> > User > >>> > >> >> error? > >>> > >> >> > > > >>> > >> >> > >-Michal > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >
