Fixed a blocker issue in Windows8/CordovaJS [1]

I am recommending we just move forward since Windows8  is not currently
heavily used, so we can skip the whole re-tag dance.

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3214

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commitdiff;h=766ac951231b87c1a5ace025b20727fd8d9895e2;hp=360bd3e65c33ce4f01e2efb82d641a565ef3c333


@purplecabbage
risingj.com


On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote:

> I thought we decided to leave the VERSION in master branch as a constant
> EDGE or something like that?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > continuous instigation?
> >
> > @purplecabbage
> > risingj.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I've re-tagged Android with the new JS.
> > >
> > > WORST RELEASE PROCESS EVER!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Okay, so are we good with 360bd3e65c33ce4f01e2efb82d641a565ef3c333 ?
> > > > I have tagged WP7+8
> > > >
> > > > @purplecabbage
> > > > risingj.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Getting merge conflicts! Seriously, WTF?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Tim Kim <timki...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >> > Oh turns out I just didn't push up the 2.7.x changes :)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thought something crazier was going on. OK - I think it should be
> > good
> > > >> now!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > *crosses fingers*
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 19 April 2013 17:37, Tim Kim <timki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Ya...I just realised. Arghhhh.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 19 April 2013 17:35, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> rc1 tag is on master but not the 2.7.x branch
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> @purplecabbage
> > > >> >>> risingj.com
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> > Hey it's no so bad, just find the chevrons and pick the right
> > > >> section.
> > > >> >>> If
> > > >> >>> > you gtg I can take care of it
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Jesse <
> purplecabb...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>> > > Hurry! It's Friday.
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> > > @purplecabbage
> > > >> >>> > > risingj.com
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Tim Kim <
> timki...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> > > > NOOOOOOO
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > On 19 April 2013 17:15, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > You checked in merge conflicts. e.g.
> > > >> >>> > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > +<<<<<<< HEAD
> > > >> >>> > > > >  2.5.0
> > > >> >>> > > > > +=======
> > > >> >>> > > > > +2.7.0rc1
> > > >> >>> > > > > +>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>> > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Tim Kim <
> > > timki...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > Ok, it should be good to go now.
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > On 19 April 2013 16:59, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > Can you commit them to the two branches from your
> > > local? If
> > > >> >>> not
> > > >> >>> > > when
> > > >> >>> > > > we
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > generate the js off the branches it's not correct
> > > >> >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Tim Kim <
> > > >> timki...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >>> > > wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Ya I couldn't find them either. My guess is that
> the
> > > "Set
> > > >> >>> > VERSION
> > > >> >>> > > > to
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > 2.7.0"
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > commit was in a detached head state when pushed to
> > the
> > > >> >>> repo. I
> > > >> >>> > > > wasn't
> > > >> >>> > > > > > too
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > sure what was going on, so I decided to go with
> the
> > > flow.
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > On 19 April 2013 16:46, Shazron <
> shaz...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > Looking at cordova-js:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=summary
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > The 2.7.0rc1 tag, the last two commits:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/2.7.0rc1
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > 1. Fixed version number
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > 2. Set VERSION to 2.7.0
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > I can't seem to find these commits in any
> branch,
> > > not
> > > >> >>> 2.7.x,
> > > >> >>> > > nor
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > master.
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > Am I going crazy or is there something else
> going
> > > on?
> > > >> :/
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Tim Kim <
> > > >> >>> timki...@gmail.com
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > Done and done.
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > On 19 April 2013 14:21, Filip Maj <
> > f...@adobe.com>
> > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > Probably a retag since we use the contents
> of
> > > >> VERSION
> > > >> >>> to
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > interpolate
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > the
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > framework version string into the JS-only
> > > >> platforms'
> > > >> >>> JS.
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > On 4/19/13 2:16 PM, "Tim Kim" <
> > > timki...@gmail.com>
> > > >> >>> > wrote:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >Hey gang,
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >I noticed that the 2.7.0rc1 tag commit for
> > > >> Cordova JS
> > > >> >>> > sets
> > > >> >>> > > > the
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > version
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >just 2.7.0:
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=d0ffb8
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >52378ff018bac2f3b12c38098a19b8ce00
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >Small thing really - should we just force a
> > > retag
> > > >> or
> > > >> >>> do
> > > >> >>> > > > > > something
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > else?
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >--
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >Timothy Kim
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > Timothy Kim
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > --
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Timothy Kim
> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > > > --
> > > >> >>> > > > > > Timothy Kim
> > > >> >>> > > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > >
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > > > --
> > > >> >>> > > > Timothy Kim
> > > >> >>> > > >
> > > >> >>> > >
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> --
> > > >> >> Timothy Kim
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Timothy Kim
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to