Why was this added? Is it required? @purplecabbage risingj.com
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've updated our NOTICE file indicating that we're using OkHTTP as per > the Apache Licence. I think that's good enough, and I noticed the > headers were not touched, which is good. > > Basing it on this: https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html and > the AOSP Notice File: > https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/av/+/jb-dev/NOTICE > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@google.com> > wrote: > > I'm not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice ;) but OkHTTP is > > apache-licensed, as is Cordova, and I believe that the terms of the > Apache > > license allow us to embed it for distribution. > > > > There's probably someone in Apache who is far more qualified than I to > say > > what we can and should do, though. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hey > >> > >> I saw that okhttp was added, but I don't know if including the source > >> and as such re-distributing it this way is correct or not. Is there > >> someone around to clarify whether it's OK for us to use the library in > >> this way in the project or not, or whether we have to do what we do > >> with commons-codec? > >> > >> Anyone know the correct answer? > >> > >> Joe > >> >
