Yeah, I offered to do some extra testing once I got free but it was too late.
Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Lorin Beer <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Andrew had some valid concerns about the quality of the release, > and delaying the release until later in the week to make sure it was as > solid as possible for the month of conferences. > These concerns we're kind of ignored in the process of our 'lazy release' > process. > > That having been said, a vote process would not be a step in the right > direction, we just need to pay attention to the conversations happening > around the release. > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ugh, ya, that sort of thing leads to design by committee and voting >> blocks. lets not. >> >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > +1 lazy consensus. Cordova has a consistent release schedule so voting on >> > something that is predictable seems overkill. >> > >> > If you feel you'd like to change the release process to include an >> > official vote, Andrew, then we should start a vote on the private list, >> > I.e. Vote-to-change-the-process kind of vote. >> > >> > On 5/1/13 3:37 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>Ultimately its up to us how we want to run with it. Far prefer lazy >> >>consensus to voting. >> >> >> >>On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> >> >>wrote: >> >>> Even in the pre-updated release steps, it explicitly says we need a >> vote >> >>> and refers to this "apache way" doc: >> >>> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> We decided on voting for each release? I thought it was lazy consensus >> >>>>(as >> >>>> with all decisions we make)? >> >>>> >> >>>> On 5/1/13 1:17 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >I'm not sure I saw the vote thread, nor an announcement release, but >> >>>> >issues >> >>>> >are being closed that indicate that it has happened. >> >>>> > >> >>>> >I appreciate everyone's effort in getting it out, but the vote is a >> >>>>super >> >>>> >important step because it's our last chance to say "is everyone >> >>>> >comfortable >> >>>> >with this release". >> >>>> > >> >>>> >I'd like to say that it was clearly documented on the release wiki >> >>>>page >> >>>> >(which it is)... but the wiki's been down for two days :P. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> > >>
