The JIRA issue already exists: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2657
I believe that the 3.0 branch already had this, so I want to throw this in 2.8 so we don't lose any improvements to DroidGap that we may be making. That being said, this doesn't fix the issue of it being a kitchen sink as much as making people feel bad about putting so much crap in an activity when they should know better. :P On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pull request plus jira issue then ? ;) > > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Lorin Beer <lorin.beer....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've been listening to you complain about the DroidGap class name for years >> now, and will fully support you in the refactor. >> I'll even plus one this on the rename >> >> but I have a question to ask: >> >> 1. does this add complexity for no other reason than to satisfy a >> programmer itch? >> >> >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hey >> > >> > I think it's a secret to no one that I despise the DroidGap class and >> > that I would like to see it refactored into non-existance. However, >> > given the fact that we don't have the time for that right now, can we >> > at least rename it to CordovaActivity and create an empty DroidGap >> > class derived from it for backwards compatibility reasons? >> > >> > Do we think that this is doable by the time 3.0 is out? >> > >> > Joe >> > >>
