Which repos would need refactoring, Brian? On 5/9/13 2:56 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>I'm a no on this. Conceptually grouping by operating system vendor >makes more sense (to me). If we're going down this path the other >repos need to be refacored to reflect it: cordova-platform-* (and >Windows will need breaking out). > >(Also I'm not a fan of mixing pascal case with camel case but thats a >separate issue!) > >On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Lorin Beer <lorin.beer....@gmail.com> >wrote: >> Currently, BlackBerry exists as a single repository containing 3 >>different >> implementations of Cordova: BB7, PlayBook and BB10. >> >> This has been great from a user perspective: the cordova create tool >> allowed you to specify which target you wanted to build/run to once a >> project has been created. >> >> However, BlackBerry has split the new BB10 implementation off from the >> previous project structure: it now lives in a separate tree, and runs >>with >> it's own implementation of the tools. >> >> With the decision to send BB7 off to the farm getting positive >>feedback, I >> want to reopen the discussion of BlackBerry's project structure. >> >> Proposition: >> split the BB platform implementations, with 3 repositories: >> apache/Cordova-BlackBerry7 >> apache/Cordova-BlackBerryPlaybook >> apache/Cordova-BlackBerry10 >> >> we let the CLI provide the uniform interface between platforms, and >>treat >> these as separate implentations. It also gets ahead of the work to drop >>BB7 >> and avoids o "re-integrate" task for BB10 which sounds like a waste of >>time. >> >> - Lorin
