Well, nothing saying we can't support two formats and let the likely one die appropriately.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > I suppose - but for 3.0 we are a lock for xml, and we are probably going to > support it for a while? or 4.0? ;) > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd say we should hold off on this particular work. The schema is >> changing pretty rapidly and this would just fall out of sync. That and >> there is pretty strong argument brewing to move to JSON. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Carlos Santana <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Would it make sense to have an xsd (XML schema) file for plugin.xml and >> >> config.xml, so that folks could programatically validate their xml files >> >> against the schema with a tool like xmllint? >> >> >> >> I'd be happy to do that. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Santana >> > <[email protected]> >>
