I wish we could have changed the name. imho App is too generic a name for this functionality. I guess I shoulda complained sooner. CordovaApp would have been better. At least the js object is navigator.app and not window.app ...
@purplecabbage risingj.com On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > +1 for keeping app in core. > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Added jt back to core for now, what about the JS? > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-android.git;h=5cf95cf > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > I don't remember ripping it out and we don't have a repo setup for it. > > > > > > I would suggesting putting it back in core. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hey > > >> > > >> I know that 3.0.0 ripped out all the plugins, and it seems that the > > >> App plugin has been ripped out as well. The thing is that we need > > >> that plugin to be added to Android so that we can do the following: > > >> > > >> * Override the Back Button > > >> * Clear the Cache > > >> * Exit the Application > > >> > > >> There is also a lot of cruft in this plugin, but I think that we > > >> hastily threw it away, and I think we should add it back in 3.0.0. > > >> > > >> Thoughts?? > > >> > > >> Joe > > >> > > >
